Bug#945983: transition: petsc

[Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>]

On 2019-12-14 20:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On 02-12-2019 09:31, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition.
> > > >
> > > > The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more
> > > > constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc
> > > > is stable with the old mumps than to show the new mumps is stable 
> > > > with
> > > > the old petsc.
> > > >
> > > > If you'd prefer to avoid the fuss of 2 transitions, then I'd be 
> > > > happy
> > > > to upgrade both at the same time.
>
> Please go ahead.


Thanks Paul.  Did I understand correctly you were in favour of lumping 
the MUMPS transition in at the same time to get the stack updated all 
together?  In that case in the spirit of a package deal, I suggest 
throwing in scalapack 2.1.0 as well.

If not, confirm and I'll just start with petsc/slepc 3.12.

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-scalapack.html
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-petsc.html
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-slepc.html

Drew