Hi Drew, On 02-12-2019 09:31, Drew Parsons wrote: > I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition. > > The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more > constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc > is stable with the old mumps than to show the new mumps is stable with > the old petsc. > > If you'd prefer to avoid the fuss of 2 transitions, then I'd be happy > to upgrade both at the same time. > > Note that SLEPc 3.12 transition is part of the PETSc transition. > > transition trackers: > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-petsc.html > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-slepc.html > if not > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html I propose we go ahead with all of this once cgal builds everywhere (it FTBFS on two arches currently) and migrates. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature