Hi Drew,
On 02-12-2019 09:31, Drew Parsons wrote:
I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition.
The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more
constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc
is stable with the old mumps than to show the new mumps is stable with
the old petsc.
If you'd prefer to avoid the fuss of 2 transitions, then I'd be happy
to upgrade both at the same time.
I propose we go ahead with all of this once cgal builds everywhere (it
FTBFS on two arches currently) and migrates.