[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#945983: transition: petsc



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition.

The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more
constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc
is stable with the old mumps than to show the new mumps is stable with
the old petsc.

If you'd prefer to avoid the fuss of 2 transitions, then I'd be happy
to upgrade both at the same time.

Note that SLEPc 3.12 transition is part of the PETSc transition.

transition trackers:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-petsc.html
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-slepc.html
if not
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html

Ben file:

title = "petsc";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.11" | .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.12";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.12";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.11";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled


Reply to: