[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813128: Fwd: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi



On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:44:49PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:22:12PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On 2016-02-02 14:59, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > >I'm enabling a test build  (ie with tests enabled) for experimental.
> > >I'll see if the tests pass ...
> > 
> > You did it in unstable again, but it seems to have gone well. Still fails to
> > build on s390x, but I don't care because it's not a regression.
> 
> though that failure in s390x is really easy to fix, see my #813734
> 
> > Now would be a good time to look at your rdeps for the transition.
> 
> I already filed RC bugs for all of them that fails and marked as
> blocking of this bug.
> 
> freefoam        https://bugs.debian.org/813951
> esys-particle   https://bugs.debian.org/813814
> aces3           https://bugs.debian.org/813722

And gyoto, #813725.

Thanks for filing those.

> Apart from those 3 there are 2 more FTBFS that are caused by timeout,
> that have chances to be fixed by retrying the builds, please try to gb
> elkcode/mips and espresso/armel.

Given back.

> That's considering only packages in testing, I haven't looked at those
> in sid, but looks like most of them were not binNMUed, could you please
> trig some more binNMUs?

Things that are only in sid aren't an issue at this stage.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: