Bug#813128: Fwd: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:40:11PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:44:46AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > On 01/02/2016 16:34, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:41:17AM +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > >> Its not fully ready for transition, and I need to put a blocker on it.
> > >> Small fixes for kFreeBSD, Hurd: (conditional use of --verbs in
> > >> configure), pkg-config file handling,
> > >> enabling of static if possible, tests.
>
> I wonder, why don't you build for s390x? I tried a build on a porterbox
> (version 1.10.2-2 + enable s390x on Architecture:) and it built just
> fine.
> Also I have a gut feeling x32 is going to just work too.
> And at this point it makes me wonder why not just using arch:any.
>
> The change away from arch:any seems to be (according to the changelog)
> from 2007, version 1.2.3-3, but I'm not sure if this makes sense
> anymore. At least, the package builds...
That's good news, I agree it makes sense to switch to Arch: any now and
turn on the test suite to see what breaks - that's certainly something
that should've better happened in experimental as intended, but oh well.
Michael
Reply to: