On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:44:46AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On 01/02/2016 16:34, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:41:17AM +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > >> Its not fully ready for transition, and I need to put a blocker on it. > >> Small fixes for kFreeBSD, Hurd: (conditional use of --verbs in > >> configure), pkg-config file handling, > >> enabling of static if possible, tests. I wonder, why don't you build for s390x? I tried a build on a porterbox (version 1.10.2-2 + enable s390x on Architecture:) and it built just fine. Also I have a gut feeling x32 is going to just work too. And at this point it makes me wonder why not just using arch:any. The change away from arch:any seems to be (according to the changelog) from 2007, version 1.2.3-3, but I'm not sure if this makes sense anymore. At least, the package builds... -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature