[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813128: Fwd: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I'm enabling a test build  (ie with tests enabled) for experimental.
I'll see if the tests pass ...

regards
Alastair


On 02/02/2016 15:40, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:44:46AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 01/02/2016 16:34, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:41:17AM +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>>> Its not fully ready for transition, and I need to put a blocker on it.
>>>> Small fixes for kFreeBSD, Hurd: (conditional use of --verbs in
>>>> configure), pkg-config file handling,
>>>> enabling of static if possible, tests.
>
> I wonder, why don't you build for s390x? I tried a build on a porterbox
> (version 1.10.2-2 + enable s390x on Architecture:) and it built just
> fine.
> Also I have a gut feeling x32 is going to just work too.
> And at this point it makes me wonder why not just using arch:any.
>
> The change away from arch:any seems to be (according to the changelog)
> from 2007, version 1.2.3-3, but I'm not sure if this makes sense
> anymore.  At least, the package builds...
>

- -- 
Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>,
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=cXP9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: