Bug#813916: transition: gdal
On 07/03/16 06:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> What to do about the entanglement with the libvigraimpex transition
> (#815153) through saga?
>
> Should we get saga removed from testing to allow the rest of the
> affected packages in the gdal transition to migrate?
I'm not sure that'll be necessary, as it looks like libgdal20 can migrate while
libgdal1i stays in testing (until those issues are sorted out).
We'll see what happens once gdal is old enough, but if that's a problem, then
yes, I'll add removal hints as necessary.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: