[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813916: transition: gdal



On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-03-16 20:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>>>>>>>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have
>>>>>>>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition
>>>>>>>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse
>>>>>>>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for
>>>>>>>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available
>>>>>>>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with
>>>>>>>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been
>>>>>>>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL
>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list
>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that
>>>>>>>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse
>>>>>>>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of
>>>>>>>>>> rebuilds is included below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to wait.
>>>>>>>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going
>>>>>>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the
>>>>>>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was
>>>>>>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0.
>>>>>>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the
>>>>>>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first,
>>>>>>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch
>>>>>>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has
>>>>>>>> passed NEW.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, let's do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for
>>>>>> transition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and
>>>>>> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too,
>>>>>> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the
>>>>>> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it
>>>>>> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal
>>>>>> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Transition: gdal
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1)
>>>>>>  libgdal.so.1-1.11.3       -> gdal-abi-2-0-2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4)                           OK
>>>>>>  fiona             (1.6.3-2)                          OK
>>>>>>  gazebo            (6.5.0+dfsg-2)                     OK
>>>>>>  gmt               (5.2.1+dfsg-3)                     OK
>>>>>>  imposm            (2.6.0+ds-2)                       OK
>>>>>>  libcitygml        (2.0-1)                            OK
>>>>>>  liblas            (1.8.0-7)                          OK
>>>>>>  libosmium         (2.6.0-1)                          OK
>>>>>>  mapcache          (1.4.0-4)                          OK
>>>>>>  mapnik            (3.0.9+ds-1)                       OK
>>>>>>  mapserver         (7.0.0-9)                          OK
>>>>>>  merkaartor        (0.18.2-5)                         OK
>>>>>>  mysql-workbench   (6.3.4+dfsg-3)                     OK
>>>>>>  ncl               (6.3.0-6)                          OK
>>>>>>  node-srs          (0.4.8+dfsg-2)                     OK
>>>>>>  openscenegraph    (3.2.1-9)                          OK
>>>>>>  osmium            (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1)           OK
>>>>>>  osrm              (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2)                  OK
>>>>>>  postgis           (2.2.1+dfsg-2)                     OK
>>>>>>  pprepair          (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1)           OK
>>>>>>  prepair           (0.7-4)                            OK
>>>>>>  qlandkartegt      (1.8.1+ds-4)                       OK
>>>>>>  qmapshack         (1.5.1-1)                          OK
>>>>>>  rasterio          (0.31.0-2)                         OK
>>>>>>  saga              (2.2.3+dfsg-1)                     OK
>>>>>>  sumo              (0.25.0+dfsg1-2)                   OK
>>>>>>  thuban            (1.2.2-9)                          OK
>>>>>>  vtk6              (6.2.0+dfsg1-7)                    OK
>>>>>>  xastir            (2.0.6-4)                          OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  grass             (7.0.3-1)                          OK
>>>>>>  osgearth          (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK
>>>>>>  osmcoastline      (2.1.2-1)                          OK
>>>>>>  pktools           (2.6.6-1)                          OK
>>>>>>  pyosmium          (2.6.0-1)                          OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  libgdal-grass     (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1)               FTBFS / OK
>>>>>>  qgis              (2.8.6+dfsg-1)                     OK
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better
>>>>> than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the auto-gdal tracker is better. The tracker for 1.11.4 can be removed.
>>>>
>>>>> Let's do this.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly.
>>>
>>> Looks like gdal-bin is uninstallable on mips64el as it depends on gdal-abi-2-0-1:
>>
>> Fixed in gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2).
> 
> The ben file should probably be updated to mark packages depending on
> gdal-abi-2-0-1 as bad (e.g. like the attached gdal.ben).
> 
> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be
> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry about that.
> 
> I think this requires both new NMUs combined with dep-waits to ensure
> they don't rebuild with -1, I've included the list of nmu & dw commands
> in the attached gdal_2.0.2+dfsg-2_nmu-dw.txt

libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) picked up the old gdal via grass (7.0.3-1) on
mips, mipsel, mips64el & hurd-i386, these need to binNMUed to build with
gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2) & grass (7.0.3-2). The nmu & dw commands are attached.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
nmu libgdal-grass_2.0.2-1 . mips mipsel mips64el hurd-i386 . -m "Rebuild with grass-core (>= 7.0.3-2)"
dw libgdal-grass_2.0.2-1 . mips mipsel mips64el hurd-i386 . -m "grass-core (>= 7.0.3-2)"

Reply to: