Bug#813916: transition: gdal
On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>>>>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have
>>>>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition
>>>>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse
>>>>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for
>>>>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available
>>>>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with
>>>>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been
>>>>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL
>>>>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list
>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that
>>>>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse
>>>>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of
>>>>>>> rebuilds is included below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to wait.
>>>>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going
>>>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the
>>>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was
>>>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0.
>>>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the
>>>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first,
>>>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch
>>>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has
>>>>> passed NEW.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, let's do that.
>>>
>>> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for
>>> transition.
>>>
>>> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and
>>> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too,
>>> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the
>>> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it
>>> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal
>>> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too.
>>>
>>> All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> Transition: gdal
>>>
>>> libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1)
>>> libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 -> gdal-abi-2-0-2
>>>
>>> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>>>
>>> dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK
>>> fiona (1.6.3-2) OK
>>> gazebo (6.5.0+dfsg-2) OK
>>> gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK
>>> imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK
>>> libcitygml (2.0-1) OK
>>> liblas (1.8.0-7) OK
>>> libosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
>>> mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK
>>> mapnik (3.0.9+ds-1) OK
>>> mapserver (7.0.0-9) OK
>>> merkaartor (0.18.2-5) OK
>>> mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK
>>> ncl (6.3.0-6) OK
>>> node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK
>>> openscenegraph (3.2.1-9) OK
>>> osmium (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1) OK
>>> osrm (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2) OK
>>> postgis (2.2.1+dfsg-2) OK
>>> pprepair (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1) OK
>>> prepair (0.7-4) OK
>>> qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-4) OK
>>> qmapshack (1.5.1-1) OK
>>> rasterio (0.31.0-2) OK
>>> saga (2.2.3+dfsg-1) OK
>>> sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-2) OK
>>> thuban (1.2.2-9) OK
>>> vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-7) OK
>>> xastir (2.0.6-4) OK
>>>
>>> grass (7.0.3-1) OK
>>> osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK
>>> osmcoastline (2.1.2-1) OK
>>> pktools (2.6.6-1) OK
>>> pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
>>>
>>> libgdal-grass (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1) FTBFS / OK
>>> qgis (2.8.6+dfsg-1) OK
>>
>> I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better
>> than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now?
>
> Yes, the auto-gdal tracker is better. The tracker for 1.11.4 can be removed.
>
>> Let's do this.
>
> Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly.
Looks like gdal-bin is uninstallable on mips64el as it depends on gdal-abi-2-0-1:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=mips64el&ver=2.0.2%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1456967840
Reply to: