Bug#813916: transition: gdal
On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>>>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have
>>>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition
>>>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse
>>>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for
>>>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available
>>>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with
>>>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been
>>>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL
>>>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list
>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that
>>>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse
>>>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of
>>>>>> rebuilds is included below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to wait.
>>>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see.
>>>>
>>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going
>>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the
>>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was
>>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0.
>>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the
>>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now.
>>>>
>>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first,
>>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch
>>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has
>>>> passed NEW.
>>>
>>> Sure, let's do that.
>>
>> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for
>> transition.
>>
>> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and
>> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too,
>> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the
>> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it
>> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal
>> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too.
>>
>> All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0.
>>
>>
>> Transition: gdal
>>
>> libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1)
>> libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 -> gdal-abi-2-0-2
>>
>> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>>
>> dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK
>> fiona (1.6.3-2) OK
>> gazebo (6.5.0+dfsg-2) OK
>> gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK
>> imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK
>> libcitygml (2.0-1) OK
>> liblas (1.8.0-7) OK
>> libosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
>> mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK
>> mapnik (3.0.9+ds-1) OK
>> mapserver (7.0.0-9) OK
>> merkaartor (0.18.2-5) OK
>> mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK
>> ncl (6.3.0-6) OK
>> node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK
>> openscenegraph (3.2.1-9) OK
>> osmium (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1) OK
>> osrm (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2) OK
>> postgis (2.2.1+dfsg-2) OK
>> pprepair (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1) OK
>> prepair (0.7-4) OK
>> qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-4) OK
>> qmapshack (1.5.1-1) OK
>> rasterio (0.31.0-2) OK
>> saga (2.2.3+dfsg-1) OK
>> sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-2) OK
>> thuban (1.2.2-9) OK
>> vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-7) OK
>> xastir (2.0.6-4) OK
>>
>> grass (7.0.3-1) OK
>> osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK
>> osmcoastline (2.1.2-1) OK
>> pktools (2.6.6-1) OK
>> pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
>>
>> libgdal-grass (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1) FTBFS / OK
>> qgis (2.8.6+dfsg-1) OK
>
> I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better
> than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now?
Yes, the auto-gdal tracker is better. The tracker for 1.11.4 can be removed.
> Let's do this.
Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: