[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Architecture qualification



Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (28/05/2012):
> The practical implication of dropping the architectures from
> fucked_arches would be that out-of-date binaries would become
> blockers for migration.
> 
> We already dropped the architectures from break_arches, which means
> that new installability problems are already blockers.

Thanks for the clarification. I suggest we wait a few days until
somebody gets a grip on the current situation (newly-added graphs may
help figure out what would suffer from that), and we take action soon.
I should be able to look into that in the next few days.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: