Thanks for the summary. Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (28/05/2012): > armhf > ----- > > Seems okay. Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it > from there and promote it to a full release architecture? > s390x > ----- > > Seems okay. Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it > from there and promote it to a full release architecture? I guess we would like to get a fixed qt/kde stack on s390x first (which should only need a few uploads, hello Pino). But I'm not sure of the practical implications if we were to flip the switch right now? I have some scripts to check uninstallability issues (diffing against armel and s390x) and I guess we might need to get a few more packages ready on those archs before we do that. But again, that depends on the pratical implications above. > hurd-i386 > --------- > > Is there time to add it to testing and get it out of > {break,fucked}_arches? Would it make sense to release if it was > still in break_ and/or fucked_arches? I guess we need more than just my views on it (see relevant thread). Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature