[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Architecture qualification



Thanks for the summary.

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (28/05/2012):
> armhf
> -----
> 
> Seems okay.  Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it
> from there and promote it to a full release architecture?

> s390x
> -----
> 
> Seems okay.  Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it
> from there and promote it to a full release architecture?

I guess we would like to get a fixed qt/kde stack on s390x first (which
should only need a few uploads, hello Pino). But I'm not sure of the
practical implications if we were to flip the switch right now?

I have some scripts to check uninstallability issues (diffing against
armel and s390x) and I guess we might need to get a few more packages
ready on those archs before we do that. But again, that depends on the
pratical implications above.


> hurd-i386
> ---------
> 
> Is there time to add it to testing and get it out of
> {break,fucked}_arches?  Would it make sense to release if it was
> still in break_ and/or fucked_arches?

I guess we need more than just my views on it (see relevant thread).

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: