Re: Architecture qualification

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On 28.05.2012 13:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (28/05/2012):
> > armhf
> > -----
> >
> > Seems okay.  Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it
> > from there and promote it to a full release architecture?
>
> > s390x
> > -----
> >
> > Seems okay.  Still in fucked_arches currently - should we remove it
> > from there and promote it to a full release architecture?
>
> I guess we would like to get a fixed qt/kde stack on s390x first 
> (which
> should only need a few uploads, hello Pino). But I'm not sure of the
> practical implications if we were to flip the switch right now?

The practical implication of dropping the architectures from 
fucked_arches would be that out-of-date binaries would become blockers 
for migration.

We already dropped the architectures from break_arches, which means 
that new installability problems are already blockers.

Regards,

Adam