Quoting Adam D. Barratt (firstname.lastname@example.org): > Ah, okay. :-) > > In that case I'll mark this thread to come back to once 6.0.1 is out of > the way and we can look at it for 6.0.2. Yes. I think that my mistake was tagging the mail "[SRU]". Should have been "[SRM]", I guess. Sorry for making you lose valuable time during the preparation of 6.0.1.
Description: Digital signature