Quoting Adam D. Barratt (email@example.com): > Would it be possible to have a debdiff against the current > proposed-updates package which includes the combined proposed changes > for the printing related bugs? From a quick look through the separated > patches, it looks like some of them modify parts of the code touched by > earlier patches. Is all of that set of patches really needed to fix the > issues? It's not exactly small to review, given that today is the > advertised deadline for freezing 6.0.1. :-( The debdiff is likely to show the same. I kept the 9 upstream patches as they were in git, because the commit messages were clear about the set of patches to be all inter-related. Given the complexity of samba printing code (thanks to the clumsy printing protocol implemented in Microsoft Windows systems), I wouldn't advise for isolating these patches.
Description: Digital signature