Re: Your recent sqlite3 and neon27 uploads
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:48 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > how about
> > > > something like:
> > > You mean leave 0.29.5 in the archive as is, but with shlibs as 0.29.3 ?
> > > Like I prepared the package[1] and as debdiff[2] shows?
> >
> > Sorry if I've introduced any confusion here. To be honest, my thought
> > was more toward re-introducing 0.29.3, hence the mention of a
> > 0.29.5really0.29.3 "upstream" source version.
>
> Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
> then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would
> be fine.
Ping?
Reply to: