Re: Your recent sqlite3 and neon27 uploads

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:48 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > how about
> > > something like:
> >  You mean leave 0.29.5 in the archive as is, but with shlibs as 0.29.3 ?
> > Like I prepared the package[1] and as debdiff[2] shows?
> 
> Sorry if I've introduced any confusion here.  To be honest, my thought
> was more toward re-introducing 0.29.3, hence the mention of a
> 0.29.5really0.29.3 "upstream" source version.

Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh*  If you were
suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would
be fine.

Regards,

Adam (who promises to stop replying to himself, at least for tonight)