On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 23:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 23:00:47 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 21:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 21:22 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > > > I am not really sure what to do. I forgot to build depend on a newer > > > > version of coinutils in the package coinor-cbc causing a FTBS in squeeze > > > > (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595847 ). > > > > > > > > However, coinutils and coinor-symphony both are waiting to enter squeeze > > > > for 65 / 117 days now due to atlas not entering squeeze. > > > > > > > > So what now? Shall I fix the build-depends in cbc and do a new upload or > > > > could someone hint all of the coinor-* / coinutils packages to enter > > > > squeeze (which would also fix the above FTBS) even though atlas is not > > > > yet through? > > > > > > Forcing the current coin* packages in to testing wouldn't resolve the RC > > > bug; if coinor-cbc requires a minimum version of coinutils in order to > > > build then that needs to be specified in the build-dependencies. > > > > > > It would also need a very large britney hammer, as it would render the > > > armel packages of coin* uninstallable; they depend on libatlas3gf-base > > > which doesn't exist on armel in testing. > > > > OK, I've uploaded coinor-cbc_2.5.0-2 fixing the build depends. Please > > unblock such that it can enter testing after 2 days. > > > Does that mean you expect to have fixed atlas to build on all > architectures in 2 days? No, it means that coinor-cbc needs to be unblocked to be able to enter testing when atlas does. Your sentence is a bit cryptic to me - do you want me to drop the dependency on atlas? Soeren -- For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part