Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
On 08/18/2010 06:43 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
>
> So what to do?
>
> Option 0: let the upstream which is (nearly) bugfix-only release in
>
> Option 1: backport bugfixes and let such a package in in this case I
> need to know which parts exactly you dislike so we know what to
> backport.
>
> Option 2: remove the package. We do dislike this most (I'm sure every
> package maintainer would ;)) See above why we think this is bad to
> do.
>
Option 2.
I hope to see it in Squeeze+1, when it will be more tested, with more
users. You explained how this package could be useful for other
packages. But, I needed to know why it's worth including it in Squeeze.
The development your were planning to do will be outside Squeeze
anyway.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to:
- References:
- Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
- From: Philipp Schafft <lion@lion.leolix.org>
- Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
- Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
- From: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
- Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
- Re: Freeze exception: roaraudio, muroard, libao
- From: Philipp Schafft <lion@lion.leolix.org>