Re: Freeze for LLVM packages

[Arthur Loiret <aloiret@debian.org>]

2010/8/23, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote:
>> 2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
>>>> This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this
>>>> side.
>>>
>>> Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting to
>>> be uploaded. How much is "a bit of work"?  One issue I did notice is
>>> that llvm-defaults is missing a build-dependency on m4 (having tried
>>> building it in a clean(ish) chroot).
>>
>> The source package was given "in its current state", so not ready to
>> be uploaded yet. The "bit of work" remaining is quite small (partly
>> done locally already). I will probably give you the finished version
>> later today.
>
> Any news on this?  How far off are you from having a final version of
> llvm-defaults and llvm-2.6 ready? (I'm assuming/hoping that the latter
> would largely be a copy of the current llvm source package with the
> necessary symlinks added, rather than also including a new upstream
> version).

Here is llvm-defaults:
http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-defaults_0.1.dsc

It should be close to its final state, but note its libllvm-ocaml-dev
package is not installable yet because I need to do an llvm-2.7 upload
before. llvm-runtime, llvm and llvm-dev are fine.

llvm-gcc-4.2 is now fixed.

llvm-2.6 is on its way, and will be quite simple: no source changes
from the llvm package, just a few packaging bits.


Thanks,
Arthur.