Re: libparted0 upgrade problems (was: Re: Launchpad Team Upgrade Project)
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:43:50PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:18:38PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > You may be right (unfortunately), although I think libparted0d would be
> > good enough and would save my poor typing fingers a bit. (There's
> > precedent for that in libavcodec et al.)
>
> I suppose you mean just editing the package name and leaving the SONAME
> as-is?
Yes. I don't want to diverge from the upstream SONAME.
> (That's a bit off the usual 0d suffix, though.)
Oh, is it? If there's a more appropriate convention, I'd certainly
prefer it.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: