Re: [SRM] Bug #554793
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 19:48 +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:04:23PM +0000, Tim Small wrote:
> > and it seems that only part of the fix has been applied - the change to
> > /etc/init.d/wd_keepalive is not present WRT the patch in #554793
> Right, and yes, I simply missed it. However, thinking about it some more I
> wonder if that part is really important. The only use case is a restart of the
> wd_keepalive daemon, but I simply cannot see a reason to do that. Please keep
> in mind that wd_keepalive has only one use case, namely keeping the watchdog
> device triggered while watchdog itself has not yet started or already ended. So
> why should I restart it? Anyway, if yoz guys think it's worth it I will do a
> lenny2 version.
I'll leave it to your judgement as to whether an updated package is
warranted, but if you are going to prepare an update, please do so
sooner rather than later so that it can get built and uploaded
everywhere in time for the point release.