Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (firstname.lastname@example.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > > unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> > > from migrating for the time being?
> > >
> > The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't candidates either,
> > so I'm not sure what difference blocking the next one makes.
> That our testing users don't have to life with strange error messages
> they wouldn't get if the abi would be bumped properly.
OK, maybe we should start numbering ABIs with this next version.
Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug