Re: [SRM] Bug #554793
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:04:23PM +0000, Tim Small wrote:
> and it seems that only part of the fix has been applied - the change to
> /etc/init.d/wd_keepalive is not present WRT the patch in #554793
Right, and yes, I simply missed it. However, thinking about it some more I
wonder if that part is really important. The only use case is a restart of the
wd_keepalive daemon, but I simply cannot see a reason to do that. Please keep
in mind that wd_keepalive has only one use case, namely keeping the watchdog
device triggered while watchdog itself has not yet started or already ended. So
why should I restart it? Anyway, if yoz guys think it's worth it I will do a
lenny2 version.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes@jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
Reply to: