Re: JD package for Lenny point release
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:33:40 +0200
Philipp Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I am afraid that there are differences in handling packages which have 23000
> users reporting to popcon and 83.
First, popcon is disabled by default.
And second, 2ch BBS is "anonymous" BBS, so its users don't want to report
their profile for others.
3rd, 2ch is huge, its pageview number is... about 6,000,000,000/month in Nov 2008.
And some Debian related articles are there, so I want to follow them.
> We blocked packages for screenscraping late in the release and although
> protocol changes can happen with ICQ et al. we expect them to be of lower
> frequency than websites usually change. (Of course, ICQ can always prove
> us wrong on the whim.)
> And postgresql got a special exeception with upstream doing bugfix-only
> releases with enough QA.
Okay, you're right. And I hope not to get frequently such change for jd.
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp