Re: Bug#503712: the gs-common problem
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> * Thomas Viehmann [Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:10:36 +0100]:
>>
>>> As promised on IRC, the only way to end the madness of my mails on the
>>> subject is to either say "no, no dependency funnies, we want .config
>>> hacks" or "fixing dependencies is better than .config hacks", or
>>> something entirely different
>
>> 22:04 <dato> tomv_w: if both options work, I also lean towards the dependency
>> on gs-common
>
> Thanks for looking into this! Uploaded ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: