Re: Bug#503712: the gs-common problem
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Thomas Viehmann [Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:10:36 +0100]:
>
>> As promised on IRC, the only way to end the madness of my mails on the
>> subject is to either say "no, no dependency funnies, we want .config
>> hacks" or "fixing dependencies is better than .config hacks", or
>> something entirely different
> 22:04 <dato> tomv_w: if both options work, I also lean towards the dependency
> on gs-common
Thanks for looking into this! Uploaded ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: