Steve Langasek wrote: > What do the dependency-based init system replacements that have been > proposed to date do in order to handle init scripts that don't have LSB > headers? Is there some sort of backwards-compatibility interface so that > those init scripts will at least be run? Based on a conversation I had with Pere, insserv assumes such scripts have *no* dependencies, and runs them first. :-( -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature