[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please requeue monotone for build on i386



On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:28:47PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On 7/16/07, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> >> devel/monotone_0.35-2: Needs-Build [optional:out-of-date]
> >>  Previous state was Building until 2007 Jul 16 16:11:29

> >> -- which is incorrect

> >Uh, no, it's not.  The reason for the state change may not be at all 
> >obvious
> >from the outside, but that page takes its data directly from the 
> >wanna-build
> >database.

> I'm prepared to believe that the wanna-build database recorded a
> transition from Building to Needs-Build at that time, but based on all
> the other visible evidence, I don't believe that the i386 buildd
> actually attempted to build the package.  In fact, I don't believe the
> i386 buildd is building packages at all.  The set of packages listed
> at http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=i386&state=Needs-Build has not
> changed since this morning - I believe it hasn't changed since last
> week, but I don't have logs to prove it - the timestamps on the
> "Previous state was Building since <DATE>" lines change, but the
> packages don't progress from Needs-Build.

"Building" as a w-b state means that the package has been taken by a buildd
for building.  You would only see other visible evidence of a build attempt
if the buildd had taken the package for building, attempted to build it, and
then sent a build log (success or failure) back to buildd.debian.org.  There
is of course a possibiilty that the process will stop at any point before
buildd.d.o receiving the build log.

Anyway, it's pretty clear that there's been a mass give-back of packages
on i386, which indicates that getting the packages built is being worked on.

> >> Would someone please kick the i386 buildd?

> >To do what, exactly?

> To make it start processing packages again...

Well, the person who can fix this is Ryan Murray, whom you cc:ed on your
last message; but I'm quite certain he's aware of the state of the i386
buildd since he's the local admin for it /and/ the buildd admin for the
arch, so I trust that what can be done to get it back up is being done.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: