On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 01:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Yes, and I'm afraid the code changes in 1.8.30 aren't something I'm willing > to let through; the shell code is subtle enough that my eyes are likely to > start bleeding before I'm able to give it a thorough review. aw. the bugs that the changes fix are pretty subtle themselves, fwiw, but one in particular[1] could be rather nasty and would be nice to have fixed for the long haul in etch. i don't suppose i get any credit for having it in unstable for 40 days or so without any bug reports? would you be willing to accept a fix for [1] by itself without the quoting fixes? in any event, would an update to t-p-u with the new translations from 1.8.30 (with or without some of the fixes from 1.8.30) be acceptable? sean [1] the bug where package installation can fail globally if it's installed at the same time as a package that depends on it and the other package's config script runs first.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part