Re: unblock request: dbconfig-common 1.8.31
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:20:25PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 01:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, and I'm afraid the code changes in 1.8.30 aren't something I'm willing
> > to let through; the shell code is subtle enough that my eyes are likely to
> > start bleeding before I'm able to give it a thorough review.
> aw. the bugs that the changes fix are pretty subtle themselves, fwiw,
> but one in particular[1] could be rather nasty and would be nice to have
> fixed for the long haul in etch. i don't suppose i get any credit for
> having it in unstable for 40 days or so without any bug reports? would
> you be willing to accept a fix for [1] by itself without the quoting
> fixes?
> in any event, would an update to t-p-u with the new translations from
> 1.8.30 (with or without some of the fixes from 1.8.30) be acceptable?
> [1] the bug where package installation can fail globally if it's
> installed at the same time as a package that depends on it and the other
> package's config script runs first.
An upload to t-p-u for the l10n updates would be ok. Fixing the dpkg
order-of-operations corner case also seems like it would be ok, but I
haven't been able to pick out which change in the package is related to this
bug, so I can't say for sure yet. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: