"Arnaud Quette" <aquette.dev@gmail.com> writes:
> 2007/2/26, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>:
>> "Arnaud Quette" <aquette.dev@gmail.com> writes:
>> > I've used some unstable uploads to ask for users tests, and also test
>> > the builds since it contains a significant change (upstream release).
>> And that's exactly why I won't approve this package. We are in a freeze,
>> so please keep the diff to a minimum and only fix serious problems. The
>> diff between the old and new upstream version contains a lot of changes,
>> and I won't review them. Please isolate a short patch for each issue
>> that you feel that needs to be fixed in etch.
> the base things that must be fixed are (mostly fixes all the before
> mentioned bugs):
> - new udev script
> - patch for drivers/nut-usb.c
>
> The point on which I'm not sure is the "LSB compliance for nut.init".
> Must I fix it too for the Etch LSB compliance?
You don't have to, but it should be so short that adding this change is
worth the few lines of added diff.
> Then, should I upload to "testing-proposed-updates"?
Please provide a proposed package somewhere where I can look at it
first.