Hi Marc, thanks for your answer. 2007/2/26, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>:
"Arnaud Quette" <aquette.dev@gmail.com> writes: > I've used some unstable uploads to ask for users tests, and also test > the builds since it contains a significant change (upstream release). And that's exactly why I won't approve this package. We are in a freeze, so please keep the diff to a minimum and only fix serious problems. The diff between the old and new upstream version contains a lot of changes, and I won't review them. Please isolate a short patch for each issue that you feel that needs to be fixed in etch.
the base things that must be fixed are (mostly fixes all the before mentioned bugs): - new udev script - patch for drivers/nut-usb.c The point on which I'm not sure is the "LSB compliance for nut.init". Must I fix it too for the Etch LSB compliance? Then, should I upload to "testing-proposed-updates"? And should I set priority to high and then ping you back? thanks for your help, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/