Re: Bug#388616: Making mediawiki FHS compliant
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about the
>> > package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement is
>> > also based on incomplete information on the package ?
>
>> Of course, but how does that matter? The point is simply, if the
>> release managers intend to keep the etch-ignore pattern,
>
> What "pattern" are you talking about?
Sorry, s/pattern/tag/.
>> Therefore I'm asking the release team whether they still think that the
>> etch-ignore tag should stay.
>
> Yes, it should.
Okay, then I don't think it makes sense to discuss any new patches,
since Romain seems to believe it's best fixed with a new upstream
version.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: