* Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I'll let the RMs decide whether iceape and icedove upgrades are less > > problematic since they don't involve reverse dependencies. > > Less problematic, certainly. > > Hopefully these updates won't have the problem of past mozilla > new-upstream-version "security" fixes, where every single file shows up in > the diff because of cvs keywords? I don't think every single file will, but yes, there are a bunch of CVS keyword changes only I believe. -- Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature