Steve Langasek wrote: > Sorry Frans, but any current use of these packages is well overdue to be > fixed. Given that kernel-source-2.4.27 is RC-buggy, I'm now working through > getting its reverse-dependency tree removed from testing. > > Are there still architectures using 2.4 in d-i as of beta3? If so, why? Yes, i386 still includes 2.4 as an option as of beta3. It wasn't removed before then because I hadn't had a clear statement from anyone that we were ready to remove 2.4 before then. That support has been removed in the dailys. If the 2.4 kernel images are removed from testing then anyone who follows the docs for doing a 2.4 install with beta3 will have it fail at one point or another. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature