Re: Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
Then please clarify this in the etch release policy. Of course I had
this thought myself and checked with the release policy text. It
explicitly states that any FHS violation is RC, and this one is clearly
a violation. It would be nice if the text could be rephrased so that
it's clear what actually is RC.
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)