On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 18:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 02:33:24PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > > About this message: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00004.html > > > You wrote: > > > We do expect to freeze the full archive soon now that > > > the installer RC 1 is out > > > But also: > > > Please do not upload new upstream releases (...) > > > without discussing with the release team > > > I just agreed with Stephen Quinney to adopt a few perl packages. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2006/11/msg00042.html > > > Of course :) I picked a few packages for which new upstream releases are > > available. Some packages are already on their way to my sponsor (cc) > > for verification and upload. > > > Is it OK to upload new upstream releases for these packages? > > > libclass-dbi-loader-relationship-perl > > This one's ok, it only has one reverse-dependency. OK. > > > libexporter-lite-perl > > libxml-simple-perl > > libclass-dbi-perl > > These each have multiple reverse-dependencies. What steps will you take to > ensure that the new upstream versions don't cause regressions in these other > packages? Let's not risk such regressions. It is not so important to me to get the newest upstream releases shipped with etch. Thanks for the feedback. Bart Martens
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part