Re: Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:23:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> > directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> > problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
> Then please clarify this in the etch release policy. Of course I had
> this thought myself and checked with the release policy text. It
> explicitly states that any FHS violation is RC, and this one is clearly
> a violation. It would be nice if the text could be rephrased so that
> it's clear what actually is RC.
Agreed, the release policy is clarified now.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.