[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k release future

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Personally, I think m68k would be better served by having a testing-m68k
> > and taking occassional snapshots which serve as the supported stable-m68k
> > release, rather than worrying about something equivalent to etch itself.
> Why should we do this? As it looks right now, we are in not much different 
> shape than most other ports [...]

Roman, please stop beating that horse.

> The only problem right now is our backlog and we'll hopefully 
> see soon how quickly it can be reduced via distcc.

FWIW, that would be a lot more convincing if it had happened a year ago
when it was last suggested...



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: