Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:45:09PM -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, I'm waiting for Ari to provide me with a complete
> > list
> > of packages that can and should be binNMUed for the gaim ABI change, which
> > he said he would try to get me this weekend.
> I just did the analysis, which was to look in all of the plugins' source
> where they initialize a GaimPluginInfo structure, at the fifth element
> (ui_requirement). If it's NULL, nothing needs to be done. If it's
> GAIM_GTK_PLUGIN_TYPE, a rebuild is required. If it's neither of those two,
> a source change in the plugin needs to happen (this wasn't the case with
> any plugin package in Debian).
> So, the following packages need to be binNMUed for the new gaim 2.0.0beta4:
> gaim-autoprofile
> gaim-encryption
> gaim-extendedprefs
> gaim-guifications
> gaim-hotkeys
> gaim-otr
> nautilus-sendto
BinNMUs scheduled for all of these except for gaim-encryption and
gaim-guifications, which appear to FTBFS with the new version.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: