Re: temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel
> 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra
> ready)? squashfs and unionfs can't go into testing without dropping
> archs atm, therefore the wish to have them in testing, at least, without
> these archs.
> Packages are good and uploaded, currently in new and waiting for RM
Do you mean ftp team approval? The RMs have nothing to do with approving
packages out of NEW.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.