Re: temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16
* Steve Langasek (email@example.com) [060731 02:00]:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel
> > 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra
> > ready)? squashfs and unionfs can't go into testing without dropping
> > archs atm, therefore the wish to have them in testing, at least, without
> > these archs.
> > Packages are good and uploaded, currently in new and waiting for RM
> > approval.
> Do you mean ftp team approval? The RMs have nothing to do with approving
> packages out of NEW.
Well, we have if we are asked. :)
Anyways, as nobody raised reasons why not, I think there is only one
thing I would like to see: To have meta-packages in etch as well, and
they need to go in via testing-proposed-updates.