Re: Secure APT Key Management
* martin f krafft (madduck@debian.org) [060726 18:07]:
> also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]:
> > While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting
> > binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure
> > package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped
> > accepting signed binary packages.
>
> Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with
> signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that
> this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in
> Mexico.
Can we please drop that part on the -release-list? Though I'm personally
like that very much, it is not even near being a release goal, less a
release blocker.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: