[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Secure APT Key Management

also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]:
> While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting
> binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure
> package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped
> accepting signed binary packages.

Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with
signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that
this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in


Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
"i must get out of these wet clothes and into a dry martini."
                                                 -- alexander woolcott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: