also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]: > While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting > binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure > package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped > accepting signed binary packages. Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in Mexico. Cheers, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system "i must get out of these wet clothes and into a dry martini." -- alexander woolcott
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)