Re: T&S 2 - Die^H^H^HRelease Harder
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:44:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 2) ecj-bootstrap-gcj was misbuilt by gcj on ia64 and therefore could
> > not build kaffe.
>
> > The Debian JAVA team has addressed the two issues
> > (/usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap is no more an alternative, but a script
> > that call ecj-bootstrap-gcj if available.).A fixed gcj-4.1 has been
> > uploaded, a fixed ecj-bootstrap has been uploaded, ecj-bootstrap
> > has been binNMUed on ia64 to take advantage of the gcj-4.1 fix and
> > now it only remain for kaffe to be rebuild with ecj-bootstrap-gcj on
> > ia64.
>
> Ok, I've confirmed that the last build of kaffe was done with the old
> ecj-bootstrap-gcj, and given kaffe back on ia64. Let's see how it goes!
Now the build hit an unrelated gcc-4.1 issue, but only on ia64.
(When I reported the FTBFS bug gcc-4.0 was still the default compiler).
> So with the fixed version, the new error is:
>
> leading:
> gtk-sharp2,gecko-sharp2,gnome-keyring-sharp,gtksourceview-sharp2,monodevelop
> start: 155+429: i-15:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-133:m-219:s-32:s-45
> orig: 155+429: i-15:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-133:m-219:s-32:s-45
> easy: 162+428: i-21:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-14:a-132:m-219:s-32:s-45
> * i386: monodevelop, monodevelop-boo, monodevelop-java, monodevelop-nunit, monodevelop-query, monodevelop-versioncontrol
> * powerpc: muine
>
> This is caused by:
>
> $ grep-excuses monodevelop
> monodevelop (0.9-1 to 0.10-1)
> Maintainer: Mirco Bauer
> 43 days old (needed 5 days)
> monodevelop/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libmono-cecil0.3-cil (>= 0.3)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Valid candidate
> Depends: monodevelop gtk-sharp2
>
> The current version of cecil seems to be libmono-cecil0.4-cil.
>
> Since the monodevelop packages are arch: all, I guess this needs a sourceful
> upload. Could you please check whether this is fixed by a simple rebuild,
> and file a bug against monodevelop?
Done: bug #374211. The package actually FTBFS currently, but updating the
build-depends fix the problem.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: