Hi Bill,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:00:17PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
> > select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
> > work list.
> Of the previous buglist, only one was not fixed:
> #350407: lessdisks-terminal: modifies /etc/kernel-img.conf in postinst
> but lessdisks has other problems and the maintainer know how to fix this
> one.
Fair enough.
> I have fixed two RC bugs in the gbib package
> #334221: gbib: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: Old gettext macro.
> #334407: gbib segfaults after update
> I have worked on having a fixed gcc-2.95 version, see bug
> #350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS with new make
> #373098: gcc-2.95: f77 FTBFS on alpha (work-around provided)
> I have also provided a fix for
> #349807 FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/libtowitoko.so\': No such file or directory
> I have also reviewed old RC bugs to see whether they still applied to
> etch/sid packages. I have closed half a dozen RC bugs this way.
Good, thanks. :)
> > Bill Allombert
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kaffe&arch=ia64&ver=2%3A1.1.7-2&stamp=1146095882&file=log
> This bug just wait for a retry of kaffe on ia64.
> Background: There were two issues:
> 1) kaffe used /usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap which was an alternative.
> kaffe would FTBFS only if /usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap pointed to
> ecj-bootstrap-gcj.
> 2) ecj-bootstrap-gcj was misbuilt by gcj on ia64 and therefore could
> not build kaffe.
> The Debian JAVA team has addressed the two issues
> (/usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap is no more an alternative, but a script
> that call ecj-bootstrap-gcj if available.).A fixed gcj-4.1 has been
> uploaded, a fixed ecj-bootstrap has been uploaded, ecj-bootstrap
> has been binNMUed on ia64 to take advantage of the gcj-4.1 fix and
> now it only remain for kaffe to be rebuild with ecj-bootstrap-gcj on
> ia64.
Ok, I've confirmed that the last build of kaffe was done with the old
ecj-bootstrap-gcj, and given kaffe back on ia64. Let's see how it goes!
> > Your last task for the next two weeks is now to find at least one set of
> > packages, e.g. on http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/, and send us an working
> > hint. Please don't be disappointed if your hint doesn't work on first try -
> > it's not that easy, but as you're now a bit more experienced, you should
> > forward to that level.
> I provided two hints and the first worked:
> The second suffered from a wrong-version error that I will fix.
So with the fixed version, the new error is:
leading:
gtk-sharp2,gecko-sharp2,gnome-keyring-sharp,gtksourceview-sharp2,monodevelop
start: 155+429: i-15:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-133:m-219:s-32:s-45
orig: 155+429: i-15:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-133:m-219:s-32:s-45
easy: 162+428: i-21:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-14:a-132:m-219:s-32:s-45
* i386: monodevelop, monodevelop-boo, monodevelop-java, monodevelop-nunit, monodevelop-query, monodevelop-versioncontrol
* powerpc: muine
This is caused by:
$ grep-excuses monodevelop
monodevelop (0.9-1 to 0.10-1)
Maintainer: Mirco Bauer
43 days old (needed 5 days)
monodevelop/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libmono-cecil0.3-cil (>= 0.3)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Valid candidate
Depends: monodevelop gtk-sharp2
The current version of cecil seems to be libmono-cecil0.4-cil.
Since the monodevelop packages are arch: all, I guess this needs a sourceful
upload. Could you please check whether this is fixed by a simple rebuild,
and file a bug against monodevelop?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature