[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: T&S 2 - Die^H^H^HRelease Harder



On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
> select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
> work list.

Of the previous buglist, only one was not fixed:
#350407: lessdisks-terminal: modifies /etc/kernel-img.conf in postinst

but lessdisks has other problems and the maintainer know how to fix this
one.

I have fixed two RC bugs in the gbib package
#334221: gbib: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: Old gettext macro.
#334407: gbib segfaults after update

I have worked on having a fixed gcc-2.95 version, see bug
#350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS with new make
#373098: gcc-2.95: f77 FTBFS on alpha (work-around provided)

I have also provided a fix for 
#349807 FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/libtowitoko.so\': No such file or directory

I have also reviewed old RC bugs to see whether they still applied to
etch/sid packages. I have closed half a dozen RC bugs this way.

> Bill Allombert
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kaffe&arch=ia64&ver=2%3A1.1.7-2&stamp=1146095882&file=log

This bug just wait for a retry of kaffe on ia64.
Background: There were two issues:

1) kaffe used  /usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap which was an alternative. 
kaffe would FTBFS only if /usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap pointed to 
ecj-bootstrap-gcj. 

2) ecj-bootstrap-gcj was misbuilt by gcj on ia64 and therefore could
not build kaffe.

The Debian JAVA team has addressed the two issues
(/usr/bin/ecj-bootstrap is no more an alternative, but a script
that call ecj-bootstrap-gcj if available.).A fixed gcj-4.1 has been
uploaded, a fixed ecj-bootstrap has been uploaded, ecj-bootstrap 
has been binNMUed on ia64 to take advantage of the gcj-4.1 fix and
now it only remain for kaffe to be rebuild with ecj-bootstrap-gcj on
ia64.

> Your last task for the next two weeks is now to find at least one set of
> packages, e.g. on http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/, and send us an working
> hint. Please don't be disappointed if your hint doesn't work on first try -
> it's not that easy, but as you're now a bit more experienced, you should
> forward to that level.

I provided two hints and the first worked:

Trying easy from vorlon: classpath/2:0.91-3 cacao/0.96-1 jamvm/1.4.3-1
leading: classpath,cacao,jamvm
start: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45
orig: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45
easy: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45

final: classpath,cacao,jamvm
start: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45
 orig: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45
  end: 154+422: i-14:a-13:a-52:h-34:i-12:m-8:m-8:p-13:a-127:m-218:s-32:s-45
SUCCESS (588/585)

The second suffered from a wrong-version error that I will fix.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: